A bill of particulars full#

It was as inescapable, as inevitable, as unavoidable within the course of human events as the motions of the tides or the changing of the seasons within the course of natural events. The Revolution was not merely preferable, defensible, or justifiable. That is necessary in the original and proper sense of the word, which is, or will be, notwithstanding all supposable opposition.' Characterizing the Revolution as necessary suggested that it resulted from constraints that operated with lawlike force throughout the material universe and within the sphere of human action. Thus Chambers's Cyclopedia defined 'necessary' as 'that which cannot but be, or cannot be otherwise.' 'The common notion of necessity and impossibility,' Jonathan Edwards wrote in Freedom of the Will, 'implies something that frustrates endeavor or desire. To say an act was necessary implied that it was impelled by fate or determined by the operation of inextricable natural laws and was beyond the control of human agents. The most important word in the introduction is 'necessary,' which in the eighteenth century carried strongly deterministic overtones. The issue, it implies, is not one of interpretation but of observation. Rather than presenting one side in a public controversy on which good and decent people could differ, the Declaration purports to do no more than a natural philosopher would do in reporting the causes of any physical event. This gives the Declaration, at the outset, an aura of philosophical (in the eighteenth-century sense of the term) objectivity that it will seek to maintain throughout. Rather than defining the Declaration's task as one of persuasion, which would doubtless raise the defenses of readers as well as imply that there was more than one publicly credible view of the British-American conflict, the introduction identifies the purpose of the Declaration as simply to 'declare'-to announce publicly in explicit terms-the 'causes' impelling America to leave the British empire. It dignifies the Revolution as a contest of principle and implies that the American cause has a special claim to moral legitimacy-all without mentioning England or America by name. From its magisterial opening phrase, which sets the American Revolution within the whole 'course of human events,' to its assertion that 'the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God' entitle America to a 'separate and equal station among the powers of the earth,' to its quest for sanction from 'the opinions of mankind,' the introduction elevates the quarrel with England from a petty political dispute to a major event in the grand sweep of history. Seen within its original context, however, it is a model of subtlety, nuance, and implication that works on several levels of meaning and allusion to orient readers toward a favorable view of America and to prepare them for the rest of the Declaration. Taken out of context, this sentence is so general it could be used as the introduction to a declaration by any 'oppressed' people. When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. The introduction consists of the first paragraph-a single, lengthy, periodic sentence:

A bill of particulars full#

Because space does not permit us to explicate each section in full detail, we shall select features from each that illustrate the stylistic artistry of the Declaration as a whole. The text of the Declaration can be divided into five sections-the introduction, the preamble, the indictment of George III, the denunciation of the British people, and the conclusion. By approaching the Declaration in this way, we can shed light both on its literary qualities and on its rhetorical power as a work designed to convince a 'candid world' that the American colonies were justified in seeking to establish themselves as an independent nation. 1 This essay seeks to illuminate that artistry by probing the discourse microscopically-at the level of the sentence, phrase, word, and syllable. Although many scholars have recognized those merits, there are surprisingly few sustained studies of the stylistic artistry of the Declaration. As Moses Coit Tyler noted almost a century ago, no assessment of it can be complete without taking into account its extraordinary merits as a work of political prose style. The Declaration of Independence is perhaps the most masterfully written state paper of Western civilization. The Stylistic Artistry of the Declaration of Independenceīy Stephen E.